Budgeting for Uncertainty
on October 23, 2010

Scenarios Oct10.pngWhen elephants fight, those around them need to be cautious. And this is the prospect for 2011-13, as the Western countries try to force the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China) to export less and import more, the so-called ‘rebalancing’ strategy.
Thus Budgeting for Uncertainty seems the right title for the blog’s annual Outlook for the chemical industry.
Key factors that will contribute to this uncertainty include:
The USA is aiming to rebalance the world economy by forcing the BRICs to reduce exports and instead focus on expanding domestic demand. This proposed rebalancing represents a major change from the past 20 years of export-driven development by the emerging economies, and will not be achieved overnight.
Europe is making a 180 degree shift in policy, by abandoning previous efforts to stimulate its economy. It is instead planning to achieve budget balances by reducing spending and increasing taxes. Elephants.pngIt is also lining up alongside the USA in hoping to increase its exports to the BRICs, whilst reducing imports from them.
The BRICs themselves are between a rock and a hard place. They were not the cause of the financial Crisis, but they are the ones on whom the major burden of adjustment may fall. The principal instrument of change will be the exchange rate, as the West aims to force China and others to revalue their currencies quite sharply.
These macro factors clearly raise more questions than answers. Even the issue of timescale is unclear, with the US suggesting it might take a full Budget cycle of at least 3 years for real changes to be observed. Plus, of course, there is absolutely no guarantee that the West will get its way, or that the whole exercise may not end in tears.
On the other hand, everything might go extremely well, with a renewed burst of co-operation as seen immediately after the Lehman collapse in Q4 2008. If the G20 Group of the major economies really worked together, then chemical demand could easily be stronger, rather than weaker.
The blog’s view is that Scenario planning is the only solution when faced with so many different variables. The idea is to establish a Base Case, and then develop Upside and Downside Cases which are reasonable projections of what might happen if everything went very well, or very badly.
The blog’s own effort to help kick-start this process is shown above:
BASE Case. This suggests we will see global GDP growth of 3%, with oil staying in the $60 – $80/bbl range of the past 18 months. We will still see financial market volatility, but no major collapses. It is the classic ‘muddle through’ type of Scenario.
UPSIDE Case. This assumes that the G20 achieves a ‘grand bargain’ to rebalance the world economy, allowing GDP to grow at above 3.5%. Inflation would probably become a major issue under this Scenario, causing oil prices to move above $80/bbl. Elephants.png
DOWNSIDE Case. Instead of increased international co-operation, countries put their own interests first and adopt beggar-my-neighbour policies. GDP growth would probably fall to 2.5%, and the oil price below $60/bbl, with the banking system under major strain as Deflation took hold.
The slide also suggests a number of ‘Jokers’ that companies may want to consider. These include changing demographics, such as the ageing of the Western baby-boomers. And, of course, one can never ignore the potential impact of geo-political events, such as a bombing of Iran’s nuclear plants, or new tensions with N Korea.
Of course, it would be possible to simply adopt a Base Case Scenario, and assume that this will work out. But the chances of this occurring are probably less than 50%, so it would be highly risky. Instead, the blog would strongly recommend businesses to adopt a version of the above framework, using their own ideas for Base, Upside and Downside Scenarios.
By adopting this process, businesses can then test out key assumptions in advance. They can also develop mitigation strategies, in case events begin to diverge from the Base Case view. As always, the blog will be very happy to advise on the process, if this would be helpful.
2010 has been a suprisingly good year for many companies. We can certainly hope that current performance will continue, but hope is not a strategy.
Scenario planning will give businesses the chance to adopt the wisdom of the Scouting movement. Its motto, ‘Be Prepared’, seems the best possible approach in today’s increasingly uncertain New Normal environment.
Elephants.png

Share This Post
Comments
  • Chemicals & The Economy
    November 6, 2010

    US Fed launches its $600bn QE2 Lifeboat

    So now its official. This week, the US Federal Reserve confirmed it was launching its ‘QE2 Lifeboat’. It will inject $600bn into the US economy, in yet another bid to kick-start full economic recovery. Clearly, this is a major initiative…

  • Chemicals & The Economy
    November 11, 2010

    UK house prices begin to slip

    The UK housing market has presented a confusing picture over the past 2 years. Unlike Spain, Ireland, or the USA, the lax lending conditions of the Boom years did not seem to lead to major price falls. In fact, along…

  • Chemicals & The Economy
    December 4, 2010

    US housing markets could weaken further

    US housing was the prime cause of the current financial crisis. US banks spent most of the 2000-7 period lending at low ‘teaser’ rates to borrowers who had no prospect of repaying the loan. And by syndicating the loans to…

  • Chemicals & The Economy
    December 18, 2010

    New White Paper for New Year

    The blog’s 2 White Papers have proved enormously popular this year. Over 10000 copies have been downloaded around the world. They focused on the New Normal. This reflected the blog’s belief that the current recovery is not taking us back…

Leave A Reply